Asus TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 109%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics90.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive374% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory24.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211027
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 22 '23 at 16:48
Run Duration237 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-11900K-$254
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
109% Outstanding
Memory 94.3
1-Core 173
2-Core 342
109% 203 Pts
4-Core 659
8-Core 1,242
113% 950 Pts
64-Core 1,674
104% 1,674 Pts
Poor: 94%
This bench: 109%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro W5700
AMD(1002 031E) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
90.3% Outstanding
Lighting 113
Reflection 136
Parallax 185
92% 145 fps
MRender 109
Gravity 126
Splatting 89.2
87% 108 fps
Poor: 85%
This bench: 90.3%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$89
192GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2630 944 949 952 952 955 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
374% Outstanding
Read 2,860
Write 3,213
Mixed 2880
SusWrite 1,230
573% 2,546 MB/s
4K Read 81.1
4K Write 220
4K Mixed 116
388% 139 MB/s
DQ Read 1,629
DQ Write 1,258
DQ Mixed 1,428
1,073% 1,438 MB/s
Poor: 206%
This bench: 374%
Great: 442%
Samsung MZQLW960HMJP-00003 960GB
329GB free
Firmware: CXV8301Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 975 994 1009 1000 982 970 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
238% Outstanding
Read 1,319
Write 972
Mixed 609
SusWrite 988
217% 972 MB/s
4K Read 44.4
4K Write 174
4K Mixed 52.7
227% 90.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,491
DQ Write 1071
DQ Mixed 833
744% 1,131 MB/s
Poor: 133%
This bench: 238%
Great: 248%
WD WD8003FFBX-68B9AN0 8TB
142GB free
Firmware: 83.00A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 119 118 120 128 129 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 66% Great: 139%
WD WD8003FFBX-68B9AN0 8TB
75GB free
Firmware: 83.00A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 116 117 121 133 126 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
65.4% Good
Read 105
Write 114
Mixed 69.3
SusWrite 121
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 6.5
4K Mixed 1.6
356% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 139%
Seagate ST4000VX013-2XG104 4TB
319GB free
Firmware: CV11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 84 88 94 79 94 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
32.2% Below average
Read 24.3
Write 120
Mixed 40.7
SusWrite 87.8
50% 68.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.1
36% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
GIGA-BYTE Co Ltd GP-ARS16G44 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
122% Outstanding
MC Read 45.6
MC Write 45.5
MC Mixed 41.4
126% 44.2 GB/s
SC Read 27.2
SC Write 47.1
SC Mixed 35.4
104% 36.6 GB/s
Latency 58.8
68% 58.8 ns
Poor: 83%
This bench: 122%
Great: 148%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 59 60 23.1" 1280 720 GSM5A45 23MP65
Typical TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 10,922 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 150%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 151%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $838
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback