Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 140%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 180%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics163% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive463% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 months ago, 6 months ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory58.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201104
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 22 '23 at 15:09
Run Duration227 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X-$495
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
86.4% Excellent
Memory 67.1
1-Core 141
2-Core 284
86% 164 Pts
4-Core 565
8-Core 1,038
96% 802 Pts
64-Core 2836
176% 2836 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$479
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
163% Outstanding
Lighting 242
Reflection 216
Parallax 208
197% 222 fps
MRender 254
Gravity 160
Splatting 130
142% 181 fps
Poor: 139%
This bench: 163%
Great: 170%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$170
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3164 3206 3154 3246 3251 3248 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
463% Outstanding
Read 2,691
Write 3,325
Mixed 3,032
SusWrite 3,212
694% 3,065 MB/s
4K Read 76.1
4K Write 174
4K Mixed 105
342% 118 MB/s
DQ Read 1,341
DQ Write 1,020
DQ Mixed 1,153
870% 1,171 MB/s
Poor: 283%
This bench: 463%
Great: 526%
WDC WDS480G2G0B-00EPW0 480GB
55GB free
Firmware: UK400400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 278 138 64 46 19 40 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
52.4% Above average
Read 455
Write 377
Mixed 199
SusWrite 97.6
63% 282 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 41.3
4K Mixed 17
78% 27 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 102
DQ Mixed 35.2
46% 83.9 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 59%
Seagate ST2000NM0011 2TB-$54
663GB free
Firmware: PT05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 151 151 149 151 150 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
85.9% Excellent
Read 149
Write 140
Mixed 82.9
SusWrite 150
96% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 86%
Generic External 128GB
18GB free, PID 3920
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 123 123 123 123 123 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
130% Outstanding
Read 130
Write 123
Mixed 118
SusWrite 123
168% 123 MB/s
4K Read 17.7
4K Write 26.1
4K Mixed 16.3
1,508% 20 MB/s
DQ Read 17.1
DQ Write 26.4
DQ Mixed 19.6
1,628% 21 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 130%
Great: 170%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
75.8% Very good
MC Read 29.2
MC Write 27.2
MC Mixed 27
79% 27.8 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 26.5
63% 21.9 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 132%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 23.8" 1920 1017 SAM1024 S24R65x
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,857 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $194

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $1,034
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4070 $490Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback