MSI MAG B550 TORPEDO (MS-7C91)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 104%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics125% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C91
MotherboardMSI MAG B550 TORPEDO (MS-7C91)  (all builds)
Memory23.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210513
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 22 '23 at 12:39
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
81% Excellent
Memory 80.8
1-Core 152
2-Core 295
95% 176 Pts
4-Core 460
8-Core 511
64% 486 Pts
64-Core 510
32% 510 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 81%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 545.84
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
125% Outstanding
Lighting 173
Reflection 165
Parallax 155
141% 164 fps
MRender 178
Gravity 128
Splatting 112
111% 139 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 125%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kioxia-exceria SSD 500GB
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFA15.3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 469
Write 1,324
Mixed 838
200% 877 MB/s
4K Read 45.8
4K Write 131
4K Mixed 72
231% 82.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,322
DQ Write 967
DQ Mixed 1,145
856% 1,145 MB/s
Poor: 110% Great: 240%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$49
138GB free
Firmware: M3CR033
SusWrite @10s intervals: 290 423 447 459 433 377 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 415
Write 448
Mixed 385
SusWrite 405
93% 413 MB/s
4K Read 34.1
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 50.7
173% 63.7 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 361
DQ Mixed 282
236% 340 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 112%
Great: 125%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
4GB free
Firmware: 521ABBF0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 248
Write 146
Mixed 175
42% 190 MB/s
4K Read 15.1
4K Write 57
4K Mixed 35.7
99% 35.9 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 150
DQ Mixed 114
92% 127 MB/s
Poor: 30% Great: 73%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
246GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 65 63 65 65 66 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
36.7% Below average
Read 62.9
Write 43.8
Mixed 51.9
SusWrite 64.7
41% 55.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
118% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 59%
Hitachi HTS541010B7E610 1TB
883GB free
Firmware: 03.01A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 82 83 83 82 81 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
47.8% Average
Read 83.2
Write 108
Mixed 76.7
SusWrite 82
65% 87.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.3
154% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 72%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
195GB free, PID a007
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 97 98 99 99 99 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
40% Below average
Read 87.9
Write 81
Mixed 34.2
SusWrite 97.5
100% 75.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.5
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 40%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$69
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
95.2% Outstanding
MC Read 45.7
MC Write 23.1
MC Mixed 35.4
99% 34.7 GB/s
SC Read 27.3
SC Write 22.2
SC Mixed 32.1
78% 27.2 GB/s
Latency 75.4
53% 75.4 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 95.2%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 52 20 144 24" 1280 720 BNQ7F33 ZOWIE XL LCD
Typical MAG B550 TORPEDO (MS-7C91) Builds (Compare 478 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI MAG B550 TORPEDO (MS-7C91)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 108% - Outstanding Total price: $562
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback