Asus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 100%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics120% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive227% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10  (all builds)
Memory121.5 GB free of 128 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190710
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 22 '23 at 11:31
Run Duration221 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6850K-$115
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
90.4% Outstanding
Memory 93.6
1-Core 116
2-Core 245
85% 151 Pts
4-Core 469
8-Core 740
74% 604 Pts
64-Core 947
59% 947 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 545.84
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
120% Outstanding
Lighting 160
Reflection 183
Parallax 184
131% 176 fps
MRender 130
Gravity 170
Splatting 121
113% 140 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 120%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$249
553GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1055 1045 997 974 882 918 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
227% Outstanding
Read 2,069
Write 1,524
Mixed 879
SusWrite 978
303% 1,362 MB/s
4K Read 38.7
4K Write 81.8
4K Mixed 53.7
171% 58.1 MB/s
DQ Read 891
DQ Write 513
DQ Mixed 749
545% 718 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 227%
Great: 363%
PNY CS3140 2TB SSD
230GB free
Firmware: CS314211
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2239 1923 1308 1718 1186 1035 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
217% Outstanding
Read 1,380
Write 1,684
Mixed 1,115
SusWrite 1,568
325% 1,437 MB/s
4K Read 33.7
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 50
169% 62 MB/s
DQ Read 123
DQ Write 477
DQ Mixed 167
167% 256 MB/s
Poor: 246%
This bench: 217%
Great: 596%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
365GB free
Firmware: HP36
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 79 82 85 83 79 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
63.3% Good
Read 139
Write 93.1
Mixed 74.9
SusWrite 81.5
72% 97.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.9
148% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 114%
WD Black 6TB (2016)-$222
222GB free
Firmware: 81.H0A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 13 14 13 15 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 64% Great: 121%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMU64GX4M4C3200C16 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
143% Outstanding
MC Read 49.2
MC Write 67
MC Mixed 55.3
163% 57.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 21.3
SC Mixed 22.1
56% 19.7 GB/s
Latency 60.8
66% 60.8 ns
Poor: 105%
This bench: 143%
Great: 154%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 70: 0P 5R 10G 15B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
69% 34% 86 217 60 120 34.1" 1280 720 ACR054F Acer X34 P
History: Score 69: 0P 5R 10G 14B | Score 70: 0P 5R 10G 15B
Typical RAMPAGE V EDITION 10 Builds (Compare 1,061 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10 - $485

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $1,470
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback