QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics162% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory33.3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 33.3GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory22.9 GB free of 33.2969 GB @ 0 GHz
Display5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime10.7 Days
Run DateOct 22 '23 at 10:29
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD EPYC 7302P 16-Core
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
64.3% Good
Memory 52.1
1-Core 107
2-Core 213
66% 124 Pts
4-Core 408
8-Core 861
74% 635 Pts
64-Core 1,569
97% 1,569 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX A5000
Nvidia(10DE 147E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4000 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 536.96
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
162% Outstanding
Lighting 223
Reflection 225
Parallax 240
182% 229 fps
MRender 289
Gravity 175
Splatting 175
169% 213 fps
Poor: 154%
This bench: 162%
Great: 172%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 1TB
617GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 440 241 298 280 256 294 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 24% Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 33GB
0, 0, 0 MHz
16384, 16384, 1328 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
165% Outstanding
MC Read 64
MC Write 71.4
MC Mixed 68
194% 67.8 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 29.5
62% 21.6 GB/s
Latency 139
29% 139 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 165%
Great: 165%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 45 9 120 48.8" 1280 720 SAM7053 LC49G95T
Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 611 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $485
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback