Asus TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results


Gaming 76% Battleship	Desktop 103% UFO	Workstation 81% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	77.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	363% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS WIFI (all builds)
Memory	25.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20211027
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 22 '23 at 08:31
Run Duration	250 Seconds
Run User	BGR-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-11900K-$254 44,319 User benchmarks, average bench 103% LGA1200, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	89.9% Excellent	Memory 85.3 1-Core 171 2-Core 329 104% 195 Pts	4-Core 506 8-Core 1,018 90% 762 Pts	64-Core 1,664 103% 1,664 Pts
Poor: 94% ↑ This bench: 89.9% Great: 112%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro W5700 340 User benchmarks, average bench 90% AMD(1002 031E) ≥ 4GB Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09 Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	77.7% Very good	Lighting 96.9 Reflection 126 Parallax 180 79% 135 fps	MRender 104 Gravity 106 Splatting 73 75% 94.5 fps
Poor: 85% ↑ This bench: 77.7% Great: 101%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$87 58,572 User benchmarks, average bench 341% 193GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2762 1046 925 930 930 928 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	363% Outstanding	Read 2,723 Write 3,005 Mixed 2,714 SusWrite 1,254 545% 2,424 MB/s	4K Read 74.3 4K Write 211 4K Mixed 107 362% 131 MB/s	DQ Read 1658 DQ Write 1,294 DQ Mixed 1,455 1,094% 1,469 MB/s
Poor: 206% ↑ This bench: 363% Great: 442%
Samsung MZQLW960HMJP-00003 960GB 40 User benchmarks, average bench 201% 329GB free Firmware: CXV8301Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 1007 1007 1007 1001 999 991 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	240% Outstanding	Read 1,371 Write 980 Mixed 629 SusWrite 1,002 222% 996 MB/s	4K Read 42 4K Write 160 4K Mixed 56.4 221% 86.1 MB/s	DQ Read 1,484 DQ Write 1,062 DQ Mixed 826 738% 1,124 MB/s
Poor: 133% ↑ This bench: 240% Great: 248%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$100 129,044 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 706GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 41 41 41 41 41 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	19% Very poor	Read 50.9 Write 37.5 Mixed 38.1 SusWrite 41.2 9% 41.9 MB/s	4K Read 15.1 4K Write 8.9 4K Mixed 12.2 43% 12.1 MB/s	DQ Read 24.2 DQ Write 24.5 DQ Mixed 25.8 19% 24.8 MB/s
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 19% Great: 137%
WD WD8003FFBX-68B9AN0 8TB 282 User benchmarks, average bench 113% 142GB free Firmware: 83.00A83 SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 118 119 120 126 124 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	65.5% Good	Read 104 Write 115 Mixed 78.4 SusWrite 123 77% 105 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 6.9 4K Mixed 1.4 333% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 65.5% Great: 139%
WD WD8003FFBX-68B9AN0 8TB 282 User benchmarks, average bench 113% 73GB free Firmware: 83.00A83 SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 116 117 117 133 117 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	65.4% Good	Read 108 Write 110 Mixed 66.7 SusWrite 118 74% 101 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 5.5 4K Mixed 1.8 352% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 65.4% Great: 139%
Seagate ST4000VX013-2XG104 4TB 721 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 319GB free Firmware: CV11 SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 80 83 86 90 93 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	27.6% Poor	Read 10.5 Write 108 Mixed 35.7 SusWrite 85 44% 59.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 0.2 85% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 27.6% Great: 56%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
GIGA-BYTE Co Ltd GP-ARS16G44 4x8GB 272 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing below potential (29^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	93.9% Outstanding	MC Read 34.7 MC Write 34.9 MC Mixed 31.6 96% 33.7 GB/s	SC Read 24.1 SC Write 34.4 SC Mixed 27.2 82% 28.6 GB/s	Latency 69.5 58% 69.5 ns
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 93.9% Great: 148%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	58	29	60	23.1"	1280 720	GSM5A45 23MP65

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 10,899 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 150%

UFO

Desktop 106%

UFO

Workstation 151%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS WIFI

CPU
Core i7-11700KIntel $235Bench 101%, 65,651 samples	3,851x
Core i5-11600KIntel $180Bench 99%, 43,966 samples	1,291x
Core i9-11900KIntel $254Bench 103%, 44,319 samples	1,183x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	1,193x
RTX 3080Nvidia $899Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	1,182x
RTX 3060Nvidia $283Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	941x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	914x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	708x
670p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBIntel $80Bench 251%, 14,932 samples	494x

RAM
Skill Intl F4-3200C16-16GTZR 2x16GBGBench 91%, 10,357 samples	353x
CMW32GX4M2D3600C18 2x16GBCorsairBench 96%, 45,582 samples	312x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $69Bench 85%, 86,372 samples	306x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $842

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16