TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Fujitsu PRIMERGY RX2530 M4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive226% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemFujitsu PRIMERGY RX2530 M4  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3383-A1
Memory241.9 GB free of 256 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230217
Uptime6.6 Days
Run DateOct 21 '23 at 02:51
Run Duration217 Seconds
Run User KNA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 6152
CPU1, 1 CPU, 22 cores, 44 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
71.7% Very good
Memory 81.3
1-Core 82.9
2-Core 167
65% 110 Pts
4-Core 334
8-Core 666
59% 500 Pts
64-Core 2,343
145% 2,343 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑
This bench: 71.7%
 Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSTC-MMP1TB-25 1TB
809GB free
Firmware: SBFM61.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 422 430 398 363 369 413 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
90.7% Outstanding
Read 324
Write 123
Mixed 252
SusWrite 399
62% 274 MB/s
4K Read 32.3
4K Write 68.4
4K Mixed 36.7
132% 45.8 MB/s
DQ Read 258
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 209
179% 260 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑
This bench: 90.7%
 Great: 96%
CT500P3SSD8 500GB
401GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P9CR30A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1226 1254 1093 945 957 1115 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
226% Outstanding
Read 1,017
Write 1,179
Mixed 1,106
SusWrite 1,098
249% 1,100 MB/s
4K Read 47.1
4K Write 143
4K Mixed 66.8
232% 85.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,184
DQ Write 896
DQ Mixed 1,009
763% 1,030 MB/s
Poor: 82% ↑
This bench: 226%
 Great: 305%
CT1000P3SSD8 1TB
930GB free
Firmware: P9CR30A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1254 1224 970 1212 1210 1205 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
239% Outstanding
Read 1,122
Write 1,256
Mixed 1,214
SusWrite 1,179
270% 1,193 MB/s
4K Read 49.2
4K Write 157
4K Mixed 69.6
247% 91.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,201
DQ Write 880
DQ Mixed 1,023
769% 1,035 MB/s
Poor: 102% ↑
This bench: 239%
 Great: 394%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A4K40CB2-CTD 8x31.9GB
8 of 24 slots used
255GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
87% Excellent
MC Read 30.8
MC Write 43.8
MC Mixed 32.5
102% 35.7 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 6.6
21% 7.2 GB/s
Latency 92.5
43% 92.5 ns
Poor: 51% ↑
This bench: 87%
 Great: 161%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 32 19 0 0" 1280 720
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback