HP ProBook 645 G2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive33% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (74%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ProBook 645 G2  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 80FE
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171012
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 21 '23 at 02:09
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User MAR-User
Background CPU 74%

 PC Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD PRO A6-8500B R5, 6 Compute Cores 2C+4G
U4500, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
23.7% Poor
Memory 36.5
1-Core 24
2-Core 62.6
25% 41 Pts
4-Core 64.5
8-Core 65.2
9% 64.8 Pts
64-Core 59.8
4% 59.8 Pts
Poor: 12%
This bench: 23.7%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
HP(103C 80FE) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.09.04.01
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
1.49% Terrible
Lighting 1.8
Reflection 2
Parallax 2.5
2% 2.1 fps
MRender 1.1
Gravity 2
Splatting 2.3
2% 1.8 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.49%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SP900 256GB-$300
122GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.8.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 146 130 142 116 146 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
33% Below average
Read 174
Write 161
Mixed 150
SusWrite 137
35% 156 MB/s
4K Read 9.9
4K Write 18.5
4K Mixed 12.5
41% 13.6 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 102
DQ Mixed 114
84% 111 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 33%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16KTF1G64HZ-1G9P1 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
14.3% Very poor
MC Read 5.6
MC Write 3.9
MC Mixed 5.3
14% 4.93 GB/s
SC Read 4
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 5.6
13% 4.43 GB/s
Latency 285
14% 285 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 36%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 40 13 60 13.9" 1280 720 BOE069A
Typical ProBook 645 G2 Builds (Compare 58 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProBook 645 G2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback