Lenovo 82MJ

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics19.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive122% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
7 months ago, 7 months ago.
SystemLenovo 82MJ  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory5.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220930
Uptime12.6 Days
Run DateOct 21 '23 at 01:16
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
97.5% Outstanding
Memory 81.2
1-Core 162
2-Core 320
100% 187 Pts
4-Core 610
8-Core 999
98% 804 Pts
64-Core 1,349
84% 1,349 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 97.5%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
Legend(17AA 3A5D) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.44.56
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
19.7% Very poor
Lighting 25
Reflection 21.4
Parallax 33.8
20% 26.7 fps
MRender 15.7
Gravity 28.9
Splatting 22.5
18% 22.4 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 19.7%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme IM2P33F4 256GB
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B114215 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 305 319 249 428 405 120 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 1,495
Write 1,168
Mixed 937
SusWrite 304
217% 976 MB/s
4K Read 37.1
4K Write 92.9
4K Mixed 11.6
120% 47.2 MB/s
DQ Read 361
DQ Write 81.2
DQ Mixed 135
122% 192 MB/s
Poor: 92%
This bench: 122%
Great: 175%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HEMA81GS6DJR8N-XN Kingston KF3200C20S4/8G 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
82.9% Excellent
MC Read 29.3
MC Write 26.5
MC Mixed 28.5
80% 28.1 GB/s
SC Read 26.1
SC Write 41.7
SC Mixed 31.4
94% 33.1 GB/s
Latency 77.9
51% 77.9 ns
Poor: 84%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 3: 0P 0R 1G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
3% 3% 39 218 60 60 15.5" 1280 720 LEN9052
Typical 82MJ Builds (Compare 43 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 82MJ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback