bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics8.62% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive139% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
8 months ago, 8 months ago.
System
MotherboardIntel NUC7i5BNB
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220125
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateOct 20 '23 at 23:25
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7260U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
62.6% Good
Memory 78.9
1-Core 98
2-Core 167
67% 115 Pts
4-Core 269
8-Core 267
36% 268 Pts
64-Core 264
16% 264 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Plus 640 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Intel(8086 2068) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6286
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
8.62% Terrible
Lighting 10.2
Reflection 8.6
Parallax 11.2
8% 10 fps
MRender 11.7
Gravity 11.2
Splatting 11
9% 11.3 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 8.62%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
110GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 628 327 328 326 280 230 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
139% Outstanding
Read 1,200
Write 1,038
Mixed 494
SusWrite 353
171% 771 MB/s
4K Read 34.7
4K Write 81.5
4K Mixed 42.5
150% 52.9 MB/s
DQ Read 699
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 501
380% 521 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 139%
Great: 236%
Seagate ST2000LM015-2E8174 2TB
800GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 125 127 128 128 131 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
60.9% Good
Read 84
Write 55
Mixed 57.3
SusWrite 127
60% 80.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.7
199% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 70%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 123GB
12GB free, PID 5591
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 22 33 9.6 38 39 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
38% Below average
Read 166
Write 42
Mixed 73.3
SusWrite 35.7
88% 79.2 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 2.4
156% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 38%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT4G4SFS8213.C8FBD2 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
74% Very good
MC Read 20
MC Write 44.1
MC Mixed 19.6
80% 27.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 20.7
SC Mixed 15.4
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 84.2
48% 84.2 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 74%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 24" 1280 720 ACR0087 H213H
Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,498 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback