Asus Z97-PRO GAMER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics57% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive180% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Z97-PRO GAMER  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20160226
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 20 '23 at 22:48
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
74.5% Very good
Memory 85.7
1-Core 106
2-Core 203
76% 132 Pts
4-Core 342
8-Core 498
52% 420 Pts
64-Core 504
31% 504 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 1C03) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2007 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
57% Above average
Lighting 71.6
Reflection 72.5
Parallax 67.2
58% 70.4 fps
MRender 65.6
Gravity 68.5
Splatting 65.6
54% 66.6 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 57%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 2TB 2TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: VC0S1369
SusWrite @10s intervals: 519 713 912 1040 238 264 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
180% Outstanding
Read 1,811
Write 886
Mixed 764
SusWrite 614
225% 1,019 MB/s
4K Read 39.8
4K Write 80.6
4K Mixed 47.1
163% 55.8 MB/s
DQ Read 514
DQ Write 361
DQ Mixed 478
346% 451 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 180%
Great: 187%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
130GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1D2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 48 156 88 188 216 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
72.4% Very good
Read 338
Write 83.9
Mixed 306
SusWrite 145
48% 218 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 72.2
4K Mixed 34.4
123% 44.5 MB/s
DQ Read 223
DQ Write 317
DQ Mixed 175
159% 238 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BD160BJ.C8F Samsung M378B5173EB0-CK0 0515 CT51264BD160BJ.C8F Samsung M378B5173EB0-CK0 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
58.3% Above average
MC Read 21.2
MC Write 21.8
MC Mixed 16.8
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 20.6
SC Mixed 19.2
52% 18.4 GB/s
Latency 64.7
62% 64.7 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 165 31.5" 2560 1369 AUS32E0 ASUS VG32VQ1B
Typical Z97-PRO GAMER Builds (Compare 2,900 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97-PRO GAMER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $648
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback