Foxconn A55MX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics24.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive27.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (76%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardFoxconn A55MX  (all builds)
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111108
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 20 '23 at 13:39
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 76%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-3300 APU-$90
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
25.5% Poor
Memory 43
1-Core 32.5
2-Core 48.2
27% 41.2 Pts
4-Core 49.3
8-Core 45.5
6% 47.4 Pts
64-Core 46.5
3% 46.5 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 25.5%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 270-$140
Asus(1043 86A4) 2GB
CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
24.3% Poor
Lighting 31.5
Reflection 33.9
Parallax 39.7
26% 35 fps
MRender 28.5
Gravity 28.9
Splatting 23
22% 26.8 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 24.3%
Great: 26%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB
137GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 401000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 122 89 70 171 160 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
27.7% Poor
Read 123
Write 129
Mixed 111
SusWrite 122
27% 121 MB/s
4K Read 6.4
4K Write 24.7
4K Mixed 14.3
41% 15.1 MB/s
DQ Read 25.2
DQ Write 72.5
DQ Mixed 39.8
33% 45.8 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 111%
Intenso External USB 3.0 2TB
861GB free
Firmware: 5438
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 28.2
Write 26.8
Mixed 20.4
19% 25.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.3
57% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMZ8GX3M1A1600C10 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
21.9% Poor
MC Read 7.6
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 8.8
22% 7.73 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 6.7
17% 5.9 GB/s
Latency 183
22% 183 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 21.9%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 51 60 26" 1280 720 ARG0000 LE-24GY15
Typical A55MX Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Foxconn A55MX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 30% - Poor Total price: $278
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback