Gigabyte GA-HA65M-UD3H-B3

Performance Results


Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	18% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	25.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-HA65M-UD3H-B3 (all builds)
Memory	4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20111012
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Oct 20 '23 at 11:40
Run Duration	146 Seconds
Run User	ARG-User
Background CPU	19%

PC Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500 82,538 User benchmarks, average bench 63% Socket 1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	71.7% Very good	Memory 90.3 1-Core 83.1 2-Core 161 67% 111 Pts	4-Core 308 8-Core 313 41% 310 Pts	64-Core 258 16% 258 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 71.7% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 360 25 User benchmarks, average bench 16% Sapphire(174B E322) 2GB CLim: 1060 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 23.7.2 Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	18% Very poor	Lighting 21.4 Reflection 26 Parallax 28.1 17% 25.2 fps	MRender 23.6 Gravity 21.6 Splatting 24.3 19% 23.2 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 18% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 27GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1H6 SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 33 123 45 40 49 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	25.7% Poor	Read 152 Write 102 Mixed 62.5 SusWrite 59.1 21% 93.7 MB/s	4K Read 21.2 4K Write 12.5 4K Mixed 10.2 52% 14.6 MB/s	DQ Read 20.5 DQ Write 11.8 DQ Mixed 11.4 10% 14.6 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 25.7% Great: 100%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 155GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 90 89 88 84 88 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	69.3% Good	Read 153 Write 145 Mixed 71.1 SusWrite 88.1 84% 114 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1.1 225% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 69.3% Great: 109%
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$22 56,540 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 47GB free Firmware: 01.03E01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 82 83 84 84 85 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	53.2% Above average	Read 101 Write 99.8 Mixed 64.2 SusWrite 83.7 64% 87.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 1 168% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 53.2% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	47.9% Average	MC Read 15.9 MC Write 17.5 MC Mixed 15.9 47% 16.4 GB/s	SC Read 13.6 SC Write 14.4 SC Mixed 12 38% 13.3 GB/s	Latency 66.8 60% 66.8 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 47.9% Great: 65%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	52	21	60	21.5"	1280 720	GSM5A25 22MP55

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-HA65M-UD3H-B3 Builds (Compare 41 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-HA65M-UD3H-B3

CPU
Core i7-2600Intel $185Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	23x
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples	3x
Core i3-2100Intel $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples	3x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	6x
GTX 980-TiNvidia $560Bench 79%, 214,030 samples	5x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	4x

SSD
SSD 120GBGigabyte $30Bench 70%, 13,685 samples	8x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	2x
545s Series 256GBIntel $79Bench 96%, 17,432 samples	2x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	18x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	10x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $215

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369