PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 5.65% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
Boot Drive | 54.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Z200 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 0B40h |
Memory | 9.5 GB free of 16.0039 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20111129 |
Uptime | 6.4 Days |
Run Date | Oct 20 '23 at 07:37 |
Run Duration | 164 Seconds |
Run User | AUS-User |
Background CPU | 22% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7 870-$100
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
|
72.2%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro 2000
HP(103C 084A) 1GB
CLim: 625 MHz, MLim: 652 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 353.30
|
5.65%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
191GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 202 203 207 208 208 MB/s
|
54.4%
Above average
|
|||
Seagate IronWolf 2TB (2016)-$65
1.5TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 158 158 161 159 156 MB/s
|
84.4%
Excellent
|
|||
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40
902GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3GH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 136 135 136 135 135 MB/s
|
76%
Very good
|
|||
TOSHIBA EXTERNAL_USB 1TB
814GB free, PID b301
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 19 19 20 20 20 MB/s
|
12.7%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 65 | 52 | 60 | 27" | 1280 720 | ACI27A1 VS278 |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples | 58x |
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples | 37x |
Xeon X3450IntelBench 66%, 3,425 samples | 29x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples | 19x |
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples | 17x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 16x |
SSD | |
---|---|
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples | 11x |
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples | 10x |
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples | 6x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 65% - Good | Total price: $152 |