HP 250 G1 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.75% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive68.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 months ago, 7 months ago.
SystemHP 250 G1 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1854
Memory0.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130613
Uptime2.5 Days
Run DateOct 19 '23 at 23:09
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3110M-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
36.7% Below average
Memory 55.1
1-Core 57.8
2-Core 94.6
42% 69.2 Pts
4-Core 107
8-Core 113
15% 110 Pts
64-Core 120
7% 120 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
HP(103C 1854) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
2.75% Terrible
Lighting 3.4
Reflection 1.6
Parallax 2.5
3% 2.5 fps
MRender 3.7
Gravity 2
Splatting 4
3% 3.23 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.75%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
181GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 332 356 379 363 376 390 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
68.4% Good
Read 382
Write 272
Mixed 327
SusWrite 366
76% 337 MB/s
4K Read 20.1
4K Write 29.7
4K Mixed 23.2
76% 24.3 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 115
DQ Mixed 149
114% 156 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 CT51264BF160B.C16F 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
33.8% Below average
MC Read 12.7
MC Write 12.5
MC Mixed 12.3
36% 12.5 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 8.7
SC Mixed 0.5
14% 4.83 GB/s
Latency 90
44% 90 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 63 51 60 20" 1280 720 SAM070A SMB2030HD
Typical 250 G1 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 160 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP 250 G1 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $96
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback