Asus P8B75-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics55.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
8 months ago, 8 months ago.
MotherboardAsus P8B75-M  (all builds)
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120803
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateOct 19 '23 at 20:39
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 43%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
70.2% Very good
Memory 89.1
1-Core 83.3
2-Core 159
67% 111 Pts
4-Core 302
8-Core 279
39% 290 Pts
64-Core 305
19% 305 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 537.13
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
55.8% Above average
Lighting 69.2
Reflection 72.5
Parallax 67.1
56% 69.6 fps
MRender 67.7
Gravity 68
Splatting 64.9
55% 66.9 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
114GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 259 307 290 309 326 309 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
61.5% Good
Read 337
Write 196
Mixed 181
SusWrite 300
57% 253 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 45.4
4K Mixed 24.3
87% 30.2 MB/s
DQ Read 30.5
DQ Write 102
DQ Mixed 36.7
37% 56.3 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 129%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
193GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 114 113 115 113 112 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
65.6% Good
Read 115
Write 107
Mixed 58
SusWrite 113
72% 98.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
178% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 84%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
30GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 96 98 101 104 94 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
54.6% Above average
Read 92.5
Write 78.9
Mixed 67
SusWrite 97.6
62% 84 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
146% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451U6BFR8A-PB HMT451U6AFR8C-PB HMT451U6AFR8C-PB HMT451U6BFR8A-PB 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
54.9% Above average
MC Read 18.7
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 17.5
54% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 16.5
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 66.6
60% 66.6 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 16: 0P 1R 2G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
16% 20% 41 211 59 100 23.8" 1920 1080 LEN66D7 G24e-20
Typical P8B75-M Builds (Compare 1,515 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8B75-M - $470

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $906
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback