Asus PRIME H270-PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	96.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME H270-PRO (all builds)
Memory	9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20180503
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 19 '23 at 20:09
Run Duration	249 Seconds
Run User	IND-User
Background CPU	7%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700-$167 256,717 User benchmarks, average bench 76% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	70.7% Very good	Memory 78.2 1-Core 109 2-Core 207 74% 131 Pts	4-Core 354 8-Core 425 50% 389 Pts	64-Core 552 34% 552 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 70.7% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% PNY(196E 119E) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 537.42 Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	96.3% Outstanding	Lighting 120 Reflection 132 Parallax 122 98% 125 fps	MRender 111 Gravity 121 Splatting 110 93% 114 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 96.3% Great: 110%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
CT1000P3SSD8 1TB 44,174 User benchmarks, average bench 268% 393GB free (System drive) Firmware: P9CR30A Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 132 Write 320 Mixed 969 109% 474 MB/s	4K Read 40.6 4K Write 85.4 4K Mixed 60.2 184% 62.1 MB/s	DQ Read 737 DQ Write 312 DQ Mixed 50.6 163% 367 MB/s
Poor: 102% Great: 394%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100V -63 1TB 679 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 628GB free Firmware: AX0M1Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 104 Write 108 Mixed 38.3 61% 83.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.5 94% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 29% Great: 64%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB 179,769 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 403GB free Firmware: JU0C2J Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 136 Write 119 Mixed 53.5 76% 103 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 6.3 4K Mixed 0.6 242% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 27% Great: 79%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32 118,349 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 126GB free Firmware: AM0G3H Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete	Write 3.7 Mixed 0.5 2% 2.1 MB/s	4K Mixed 0 0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 21% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905625-096.A00G 1x16GB 101 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	38.8% Below average	MC Read 13.6 MC Write 14 MC Mixed 11.4 37% 13 GB/s	SC Read 11 SC Write 13 SC Mixed 10.2 32% 11.4 GB/s	Latency 73.1 55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 38.8% Great: 43%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	71	59	120	27"	1280 720	GSM5B71 LG ULTRAGEAR

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME H270-PRO Builds (Compare 961 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 48%

Yacht

Desktop 83%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 41%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H270-PRO

CPU
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	273x
Core i7-7700KIntel $230Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	158x
Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples	126x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	150x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	98x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	74x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	41x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	26x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	19x

RAM
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	50x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 73%, 66,222 samples	39x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GBCorsair $46Bench 69%, 47,721 samples	28x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $383

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $490	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16