MSI P67A-C45 (MS-7673)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics2.83% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7673
MotherboardMSI P67A-C45 (MS-7673)  (all builds)
Memory14.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20120801
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 19 '23 at 17:59
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
72.6% Very good
Memory 91.6
1-Core 91.2
2-Core 179
72% 121 Pts
4-Core 312
8-Core 308
42% 310 Pts
64-Core 318
20% 318 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
MSI(1462 8A9F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
2.83% Terrible
Lighting 3.4
Reflection 4.2
Parallax 1.1
3% 2.9 fps
MRender 3.7
Gravity 4
Splatting 3.2
3% 3.63 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.83%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 470 Series SSD 256GB
198GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AXM08B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 207 174 135 185 204 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
42.1% Average
Read 204
Write 191
Mixed 157
SusWrite 184
41% 184 MB/s
4K Read 13
4K Write 47.1
4K Mixed 18.1
68% 26.1 MB/s
DQ Read 16
DQ Write 66.8
DQ Mixed 20.3
22% 34.4 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-10666CL9-4GBXL F3-10666CL9-4GBXL F3-10666CL9-4GBXL F3-10666CL9-4GBXL 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
51.5% Above average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 16.3
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 16.9
SC Mixed 16.2
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 65.6
61% 65.6 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 31.5" 1280 720 AUS32AC XG32UQ
Typical P67A-C45 (MS-7673) Builds (Compare 359 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI P67A-C45 (MS-7673)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $474
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback