Thirdwave XV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 171%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 157%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics188% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive126% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemThirdwave XV  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK PRIME B365-PLUS
Memory8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190920
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 19 '23 at 13:00
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700-$243
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
93.2% Outstanding
Memory 85.1
1-Core 128
2-Core 262
87% 159 Pts
4-Core 543
8-Core 925
89% 734 Pts
64-Core 941
58% 941 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 93.2%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$879
EVGA(3842 4881) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 537.13
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
188% Outstanding
Lighting 273
Reflection 256
Parallax 280
222% 270 fps
MRender 316
Gravity 224
Splatting 173
187% 238 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 188%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$60
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 388 65 15 8 84 62 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 1,028
Write 678
Mixed 582
SusWrite 104
132% 598 MB/s
4K Read 42
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 51.4
185% 65.9 MB/s
DQ Read 330
DQ Write 657
DQ Mixed 217
243% 401 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 126%
Great: 209%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
3GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 402
Write 387
Mixed 334
84% 374 MB/s
4K Read 31.4
4K Write 65.7
4K Mixed 40.1
134% 45.7 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 291
237% 336 MB/s
Poor: 78% Great: 125%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
15GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 416
Write 386
Mixed 367
87% 390 MB/s
4K Read 31.1
4K Write 65.3
4K Mixed 41.3
135% 45.9 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 293
238% 336 MB/s
Poor: 78% Great: 125%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$88
94GB free
Firmware: M3CR043
SusWrite @10s intervals: 387 390 394 430 441 451 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
50.5% Above average
Read 91.8
Write 134
Mixed 79.4
SusWrite 416
41% 180 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 36
4K Mixed 2.2
22% 12.9 MB/s
DQ Read 349
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 159
170% 282 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 125%
Seagate ST2000DM005-2CW102 2TB
9GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 67 75 72 70 66 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
31.1% Below average
Read 36.6
Write 85.9
Mixed 56
SusWrite 71.4
46% 62.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
63% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GU6JJR8N-VK 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
80.1% Excellent
MC Read 32.2
MC Write 31.3
MC Mixed 23.8
83% 29.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 28.1
SC Mixed 20.8
62% 21.7 GB/s
Latency 70.9
56% 70.9 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 46 10 144 27" 1280 720 AOC2730 AG273QS4R4
Typical XV Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship

System: Thirdwave XV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $473
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback