Asus G11DF

Performance Results


Gaming 75% Battleship	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 73% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	60.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 4 months ago.

System	Asus G11DF (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK G11DF
Memory	9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180524
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 18 '23 at 21:09
Run Duration	132 Seconds
Run User	FIN-User
Background CPU	52%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$60 30,050 User benchmarks, average bench 72% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	71.6% Very good	Memory 67.9 1-Core 102 2-Core 216 70% 129 Pts	4-Core 405 8-Core 676 66% 540 Pts	64-Core 997 62% 997 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 71.6% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Asus(1043 8725) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2707 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.67 Performing below potential (51^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	102% Outstanding	Lighting 126 Reflection 144 Parallax 131 103% 134 fps	MRender 121 Gravity 132 Splatting 120 101% 124 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GB 50,765 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 72GB free (System drive) Firmware: M0MA020 SusWrite @10s intervals: 299 287 270 158 132 133 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	60.5% Good	Read 344 Write 384 Mixed 293 SusWrite 213 69% 309 MB/s	4K Read 14.7 4K Write 40.6 4K Mixed 22 72% 25.8 MB/s	DQ Read 229 DQ Write 277 DQ Mixed 287 207% 264 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 60.5% Great: 91%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 1.5TB free Firmware: MX4OABS0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 163 165 164 168 166 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	96.9% Outstanding	Read 173 Write 170 Mixed 38.7 SusWrite 165 99% 136 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.6 145% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 96.9% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 2x8GB 24,860 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing below potential (32^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	70.6% Very good	MC Read 29.3 MC Write 23.2 MC Mixed 26.9 76% 26.5 GB/s	SC Read 15.2 SC Write 18 SC Mixed 19 50% 17.4 GB/s	Latency 111 36% 111 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 70.6% Great: 88%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	70	58	120	24"	1280 720	BNQ7F31 BenQ XL2411Z

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical G11DF Builds (Compare 100 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 19%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

System: Asus G11DF

CPU
Ryzen 5 1400AMD $87Bench 61%, 71,313 samples	40x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	20x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	15x

GPU
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	21x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	14x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	14x

SSD
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GBBench 72%, 50,765 samples	22x
SD8SN8U128G1002 128GBSandiskBench 65%, 7,802 samples	16x
HFS128G39TND-N210A 128GBBench 61%, 41,519 samples	7x

RAM
M378A1K43CB2-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 39%, 22,600 samples	27x
M378A1K43CB2-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 74%, 24,860 samples	17x
M378A5244CB0-CRC 2x4GBSamsungBench 65%, 7,811 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $189

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16