Fujitsu FMVA56DB

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.42% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemFujitsu FMVA56DB  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU FJNB21F
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110325
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateOct 18 '23 at 20:22
Run Duration100 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2520M-$34
Onboard, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
52% Above average
Memory 77.1
1-Core 77.8
2-Core 126
58% 93.6 Pts
4-Core 158
8-Core 157
21% 158 Pts
64-Core 152
9% 152 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 52%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)
Fujitsu(10CF 15E9) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
1.42% Terrible
Lighting 1.7
Reflection 1.7
Parallax 1.5
1% 1.63 fps
MRender 2.4
Gravity 0.7
Splatting 2.2
2% 1.77 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.42%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 128GB
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 403
Write 180
Mixed 277
63% 287 MB/s
4K Read 21.8
4K Write 41.5
4K Mixed 21.9
83% 28.4 MB/s
DQ Read 247
DQ Write 37.5
DQ Mixed 13.9
43% 99.4 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16KTF1G64HZ-1G6E1 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
22.9% Poor
MC Read 7.7
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 6.9
20% 7.13 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 7.6
SC Mixed 7.5
21% 7.3 GB/s
Latency 89.3
45% 89.3 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 22.9%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 53 41 60 15.5" 1280 720 FUJ5612
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $289Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback