HP Z4 G4 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics40.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive80.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 months ago, 7 months ago.
SystemHP Z4 G4 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 81C5
Memory24.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181010
Uptime6.8 Days
Run DateOct 18 '23 at 17:26
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W-2125
CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
76.2% Very good
Memory 71.7
1-Core 114
2-Core 243
77% 143 Pts
4-Core 433
8-Core 692
69% 563 Pts
64-Core 709
44% 709 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P2000
HP(103C 11B3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1721 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 5GB, Driver: 537.58
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
40.8% Average
Lighting 49.3
Reflection 59.4
Parallax 47.7
40% 52.1 fps
MRender 46.7
Gravity 48.6
Splatting 56.1
42% 50.5 fps
Poor: 38%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 42%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDDAK480TCC-1AR1ZABHB 480GB
293GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0011
SusWrite @10s intervals: 279 349 369 393 393 400 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
80.6% Excellent
Read 359
Write 365
Mixed 252
SusWrite 364
75% 335 MB/s
4K Read 19.1
4K Write 78.4
4K Mixed 26.7
105% 41.4 MB/s
DQ Read 215
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 288
214% 278 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A2K40CB2-CTD 2x16GB
2 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
56.6% Above average
MC Read 18.7
MC Write 27.3
MC Mixed 16.6
60% 20.9 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 21.3
SC Mixed 10.3
39% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 93.8
43% 93.8 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 75 27" 1280 720 HPN3491 Pavilion 27q
Typical Z4 G4 Workstation Builds (Compare 3,078 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft

System: HP Z4 G4 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback