Casper NIRVANA DESKTOP

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics32.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive25.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemCasper NIRVANA DESKTOP  (all builds)
MotherboardCASPER CASPER NIRVANA DESKTOP
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140519
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 18 '23 at 16:27
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 16%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590-$188
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
61.4% Good
Memory 76.7
1-Core 95.2
2-Core 186
68% 119 Pts
4-Core 261
8-Core 304
37% 282 Pts
64-Core 296
18% 296 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 537.13
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
32.6% Below average
Lighting 42.4
Reflection 41.5
Parallax 39.2
35% 41 fps
MRender 37.5
Gravity 42.7
Splatting 27.9
29% 36 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Jamesdonkey JD240-LE 240GB
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JD2019
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 136 36 26 34 32 MB/s
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
25.7% Poor
Read 260
Write 227
Mixed 17.9
SusWrite 67
32% 143 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 9.5
4K Mixed 0.7
34% 9.67 MB/s
DQ Read 80.2
DQ Write 10
DQ Mixed 0.7
12% 30.3 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 25.7%
Great: 76%
Hitachi HUA722010CLA330 1TB-$38
145GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3EA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 96 94 95 94 96 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
46.6% Average
Read 67.3
Write 81.2
Mixed 44.4
SusWrite 95
53% 72 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-038.A00G 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
52.3% Above average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 19.2
MC Mixed 16.7
51% 18 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 17.4
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 80.5
50% 80.5 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 39 7 60 17" 1296 1024 PHL082C Philips 170B
Typical NIRVANA DESKTOP Builds (Compare 653 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Casper NIRVANA DESKTOP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $188
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback