bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.39% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (91%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
8 months ago, 8 months ago.
System
MotherboardIntel DH67BL
Memory1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181023
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateOct 18 '23 at 14:44
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 91%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2320-$165
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
61.9% Good
Memory 87.2
1-Core 74.9
2-Core 152
63% 105 Pts
4-Core 214
8-Core 217
29% 216 Pts
64-Core 265
16% 265 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K420
HP(103C 1106) 1GB
CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 474.44
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.39% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 5.4
Parallax 4.6
3% 4.6 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 5
Splatting 4.6
4% 4.87 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.39%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
181GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF4004RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 59 50 117 127 140 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
50.9% Above average
Read 434
Write 337
Mixed 307
SusWrite 118
67% 299 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 35.9
4K Mixed 16.2
71% 24.3 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 101
DQ Mixed 35.3
47% 84.6 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905471-004.A00LF 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
51.1% Above average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 16.6
51% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 13.6
SC Mixed 14.1
39% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 65.8
61% 65.8 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 23.1" 1280 720 GSM587E IPS235
Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,496 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback