Intel X99

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics27.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive138% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardIntel X99  (all builds)
Memory41.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201230
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateOct 17 '23 at 18:32
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
62.9% Good
Memory 66.1
1-Core 79.5
2-Core 161
58% 102 Pts
4-Core 320
8-Core 620
56% 470 Pts
64-Core 2,277
141% 2,277 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Gigabyte(1458 3740) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
27.8% Poor
Lighting 34.3
Reflection 40
Parallax 37.5
28% 37.3 fps
MRender 37.7
Gravity 38.4
Splatting 27
27% 34.4 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 2TB 2TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: VC0S1369
SusWrite @10s intervals: 750 744 762 666 57 60 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
138% Outstanding
Read 1,191
Write 798
Mixed 703
SusWrite 507
178% 800 MB/s
4K Read 32.1
4K Write 54.8
4K Mixed 39.2
128% 42 MB/s
DQ Read 488
DQ Write 371
DQ Mixed 390
303% 417 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 138%
Great: 187%
WD WD05PURX-64E5EY0 500GB
260GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 88 86 87 86 88 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
51.4% Above average
Read 92.2
Write 61.3
Mixed 63.3
SusWrite 86.4
56% 75.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.6
134% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 80%
HGST HTS 545050A7E680 500GB
413GB free, PID 0621
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 42 42 42 42 40 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
19.2% Very poor
Read 41.6
Write 41.5
Mixed 35.7
SusWrite 41.4
55% 40.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
64% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A2G40DB0-CPB 4x16GB
4 of 24 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
117% Outstanding
MC Read 53.4
MC Write 43.2
MC Mixed 45.8
136% 47.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 17.2
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 109
36% 109 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 117%
Great: 127%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 27" 1280 720 DEL4188 DELL P2719HC
Typical X99 Builds (Compare 2,310 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Intel X99

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $130
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback