Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 30% Raft	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	46.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	90.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 months ago, 6 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180824
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 17 '23 at 17:45
Run Duration	120 Seconds
Run User	CHE-User
Background CPU	100%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$104 181,631 User benchmarks, average bench 60% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	47.7% Average	Memory 68.1 1-Core 62 2-Core 124 51% 84.6 Pts	4-Core 149 8-Core 289 26% 219 Pts	64-Core 357 22% 357 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 47.7% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% Sapphire(1DA2 E353) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1284 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02 Performing below potential (69^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	46.2% Average	Lighting 58.2 Reflection 59.9 Parallax 78.4 47% 65.5 fps	MRender 60.3 Gravity 59.7 Splatting 44.7 44% 54.9 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 46.2% Great: 49%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$44 237,241 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 156GB free (System drive) Firmware: M3CR023 SusWrite @10s intervals: 337 376 378 418 384 364 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	90.6% Outstanding	Read 433 Write 364 Mixed 361 SusWrite 376 86% 384 MB/s	4K Read 28 4K Write 64.4 4K Mixed 41.1 129% 44.5 MB/s	DQ Read 226 DQ Write 208 DQ Mixed 200 155% 211 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 90.6% Great: 125%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2800 C15 2x4GB 205 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 2800 MHz clocked @ 1400 MHz Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	86.4% Excellent	MC Read 32.6 MC Write 31.9 MC Mixed 30.7 91% 31.7 GB/s	SC Read 20.1 SC Write 31.7 SC Mixed 22.3 71% 24.7 GB/s	Latency 96.8 41% 96.8 ns
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 86.4% Great: 106%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	70	58	0	27"	1280 720	ACI27A1 VS278

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,037 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 78%

Battleship

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 73%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	841x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	628x
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	291x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $296Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	298x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $238Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	237x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	227x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	102x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	91x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	74x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	181x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $55Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	134x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	128x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $452

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $23	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16