PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 37.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus M5A78L-M LX3 (all builds) |
Memory | 4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20130419 |
Uptime | 1.7 Days |
Run Date | Oct 17 '23 at 11:52 |
Run Duration | 200 Seconds |
Run User | UKR-User |
Background CPU | 46% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
55.3%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 380X-$120
Device(17AF 2006) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 990 MHz, MLim: 1425 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.6.1
Performing below potential (49th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
37.3%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hitachi HDS721612PLA380 120GB
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P23OABEA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.4 6.3 17 24 21 MB/s
|
7.36%
Terrible
|
|||
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44
4GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 30 22 27 27 34 MB/s
|
23.5%
Poor
|
|||
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
15GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 85 89 87 90 89 MB/s
|
48.3%
Average
|
|||
Seagate Basic 2TB
146GB free
Firmware: 9340
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 25 27 25 27 26 MB/s
|
22.1%
Poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM
|
38%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 70 | 58 | 60 | 27" | 1280 720 | DEL4184 DELL P2719H |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 538x |
FX-8300AMD $168Bench 58%, 49,767 samples | 207x |
FX-4300AMD $73Bench 52%, 55,454 samples | 152x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 180x |
GTX 1050Nvidia $84Bench 26%, 269,381 samples | 107x |
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 75x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 81% - Excellent | Total price: $324 |