Thunderobot 911MT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics22.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive99.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
8 months ago, 8 months ago.
SystemThunderobot 911MT  (all builds)
MotherboardTHUNDEROBOT V158PNX-HL
Memory8.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220616
Uptime4.5 Days
Run DateOct 17 '23 at 03:25
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12450H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
63.9% Good
Memory 69.6
1-Core 144
2-Core 238
83% 151 Pts
4-Core 327
8-Core 389
46% 358 Pts
64-Core 471
29% 471 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060 (Laptop)
Clevo(1558 0155) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3758
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
22.1% Poor
Lighting 25.7
Reflection 58.4
Parallax 22.6
21% 35.6 fps
MRender 13.8
Gravity 32.2
Splatting 38.5
24% 28.2 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 22.1%
Great: 105%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ssstc CL5-8D512 512GB
337GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EX92102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 130 132 132 135 135 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
99.1% Outstanding
Read 780
Write 165
Mixed 210
SusWrite 133
70% 322 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 42.2
150% 56.9 MB/s
DQ Read 440
DQ Write 157
DQ Mixed 217
182% 271 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 99.1%
Great: 208%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
King Tiger TMKS8G68AHFHD-32A 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
98.9% Outstanding
MC Read 37.3
MC Write 37.7
MC Mixed 36.5
106% 37.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 35.2
SC Mixed 24.1
73% 25.6 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 98.9%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 15: 0P 2R 0G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
15% 13% 55 191 13 144 15.5" 1536 793 BOE0910
Typical 911MT Builds (Compare 81 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Thunderobot 911MT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback