Chuwi AeroBook Pro

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemChuwi AeroBook Pro  (all builds)
MotherboardCHUWI MN15
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200718
Uptime7 Days
Run DateOct 16 '23 at 17:25
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 49%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core m3-8100Y
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
41.2% Average
Memory 67.2
1-Core 42.6
2-Core 61
39% 56.9 Pts
4-Core 90.1
8-Core 94.2
12% 92.1 Pts
64-Core 95.7
6% 95.7 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 615
Device(1E50 800E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
1.54% Terrible
Lighting 2.7
Reflection 3.4
Parallax 3.5
2% 3.2 fps
MRender 0.3
Gravity 0.3
Splatting 0.3
0% 0.3 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.54%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
C500 256GB
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0317A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 259 13 216 24 90 33 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
54% Above average
Read 405
Write 370
Mixed 339
SusWrite 106
68% 305 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 46.9
4K Mixed 19.4
84% 29.6 MB/s
DQ Read 133
DQ Write 143
DQ Mixed 46.8
60% 108 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 54%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
46% Average
MC Read 13.6
MC Write 20.3
MC Mixed 16.5
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 11.7
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 46%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 57 30 0 13.3" 1280 720 BOE06E1
Typical AeroBook Pro Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Chuwi AeroBook Pro

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback