HP Z2 SFF G5 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics108% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemHP Z2 SFF G5 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8752
Memory41.7 GB free of 48 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230712
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 16 '23 at 16:56
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W-1270P
CPU0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
92.5% Outstanding
Memory 84.7
1-Core 133
2-Core 284
91% 167 Pts
4-Core 537
8-Core 975
91% 756 Pts
64-Core 1,501
93% 1,501 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 92.5%
Great: 103%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
MSI(1462 3860) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.67
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
108% Outstanding
Lighting 133
Reflection 147
Parallax 157
108% 145 fps
MRender 185
Gravity 130
Splatting 114
114% 143 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 108%
Great: 123%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HBJQ-000H1 512GB
350GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS0NEXF
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,617
Write 2,328
Mixed 1,824
502% 2,256 MB/s
4K Read 59.8
4K Write 132
4K Mixed 81.4
265% 91 MB/s
DQ Read 1,225
DQ Write 785
DQ Mixed 990
742% 1,000 MB/s
Poor: 149% Great: 306%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M391A2K43DB1-CWE - [0x9E02] CMK16GX4M2D3600C18 M391A2K43DB1-CWE - [0x9E02] CMK16GX4M2D3600C18 48GB
3200, 2133, 3200, 2133 MHz
16384, 8192, 16384, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
70.1% Very good
MC Read 24.5
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 21.6
70% 24.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 29.9
SC Mixed 23.2
66% 23.1 GB/s
Latency 72
56% 72 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 218 59 60 27" 2560 1440 DELA198 DELL S2721QS
Typical Z2 SFF G5 Workstation Builds (Compare 203 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

System: HP Z2 SFF G5 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $230
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback