Fujitsu LIFEBOOK U772

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive80.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemFujitsu LIFEBOOK U772  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU FJNB25D
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130405
Uptime1 Days
Run DateOct 16 '23 at 13:11
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3687U
Onboard, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
54.2% Above average
Memory 79.8
1-Core 77.1
2-Core 137
60% 98 Pts
4-Core 166
8-Core 178
23% 172 Pts
64-Core 178
11% 178 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Fujitsu(10CF 16C4) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
3.05% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 1.7
Parallax 2.8
3% 2.77 fps
MRender 3.5
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.6
3% 3.47 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.05%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TE256HMHP-00004 256GB
198GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0200Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 253 249 251 247 253 253 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
80.8% Excellent
Read 480
Write 254
Mixed 189
SusWrite 251
65% 294 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 58
4K Mixed 27.8
111% 38.5 MB/s
DQ Read 343
DQ Write 218
DQ Mixed 78.1
113% 213 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
25.1% Poor
MC Read 8.8
MC Write 7.9
MC Mixed 7.1
23% 7.93 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 7.4
22% 7.6 GB/s
Latency 82.3
49% 82.3 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 25.1%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 59 46 60 14" 1280 720 LGD036B
Typical LIFEBOOK U772 Builds (Compare 36 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu LIFEBOOK U772

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback