Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.76% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
8 months ago, 8 months ago.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory8.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230712
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 16 '23 at 02:55
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron J4105
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
23.5% Poor
Memory 24.8
1-Core 42.1
2-Core 85.5
28% 50.8 Pts
4-Core 128
8-Core 127
17% 128 Pts
64-Core 112
7% 112 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 23.5%
Great: 42%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.76% Terrible
Lighting 1.9
Reflection 2.4
Parallax 2
2% 2.1 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 2.8
2% 2.63 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.76%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Asint AS606 256GB
207GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP2818E3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 326 316 316 312 303 74 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
56.1% Above average
Read 384
Write 386
Mixed 323
SusWrite 274
77% 342 MB/s
4K Read 21.7
4K Write 42.9
4K Mixed 9.2
67% 24.6 MB/s
DQ Read 96.6
DQ Write 116
DQ Mixed 14.2
36% 75.4 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x3GB
4 of 4 slots used
12GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
21.2% Poor
MC Read 7.1
MC Write 9.4
MC Mixed 8.1
23% 8.2 GB/s
SC Read 2.2
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 3.2
9% 3.1 GB/s
Latency 231
17% 231 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 21.2%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 42 31 0 14" 1280 720 BOE07F6
Typical string Builds (Compare 14,756 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback