HP Slim Desktop S01-aF2xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
8 months ago, 8 months ago.
SystemHP Slim Desktop S01-aF2xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8648
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230207
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 15 '23 at 23:38
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron J4025
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
24.4% Poor
Memory 38.3
1-Core 59.8
2-Core 61.2
33% 53.1 Pts
4-Core 61
8-Core 68.7
8% 64.8 Pts
64-Core 67.3
4% 67.3 Pts
Poor: 9%
This bench: 24.4%
Great: 35%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600
HP(103C 8648) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.73% Terrible
Lighting 1.9
Reflection 1.4
Parallax 2.2
2% 1.83 fps
MRender 2.4
Gravity 2
Splatting 3
2% 2.47 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.73%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-256G-1006 256GB
192GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 175 168 190 241 273 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
56.4% Above average
Read 283
Write 190
Mixed 238
SusWrite 205
51% 229 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 41.6
4K Mixed 21.6
93% 30.5 MB/s
DQ Read 129
DQ Write 78
DQ Mixed 101
76% 102 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 297%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP32D4S2S1MF-8 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Relative performance (0th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
12.2% Very poor
MC Read 3.4
MC Write 4.7
MC Mixed 3.9
11% 4 GB/s
SC Read 2.7
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 4.1
11% 3.73 GB/s
Latency 215
19% 215 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 55 44 60 23" 1280 720 ACR01FB Acer P236H
Typical Slim Desktop S01-aF2xxx Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Slim Desktop S01-aF2xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback