Samsung 300E4C/300E5C/300E7C

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 42% Speed boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.62% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	35.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Samsung 300E4C/300E5C/300E7C (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG NP300E5C-A06US
Memory	7.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20121015
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 15 '23 at 22:58
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	MEX-User
Background CPU	53%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-2370M-$272 10,169 User benchmarks, average bench 49% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	42.8% Average	Memory 70.6 1-Core 47.7 2-Core 76.9 43% 65.1 Pts	4-Core 85.8 8-Core 115 13% 100 Pts	64-Core 38.4 2% 38.4 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 42.8% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz) 209,058 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Sanyo(144D C652) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	1.62% Terrible	Lighting 1.8 Reflection 2 Parallax 1.5 2% 1.77 fps	MRender 2.5 Gravity 2.3 Splatting 2.3 2% 2.37 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.62% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
3 1TB SSD 1TB 4,965 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 636GB free (System drive) Firmware: HP2818E3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 178 190 189 167 179 MB/s Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	35.6% Below average	Read 147 Write 144 Mixed 167 SusWrite 179 36% 159 MB/s	4K Read 11.6 4K Write 27.2 4K Mixed 8.4 43% 15.7 MB/s	DQ Read 162 DQ Write 112 DQ Mixed 15.4 44% 96.5 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 35.6% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 12GB 60 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	30% Below average	MC Read 10 MC Write 10.9 MC Mixed 9.8 29% 10.2 GB/s	SC Read 8 SC Write 8.4 SC Mixed 8.2 23% 8.2 GB/s	Latency 98.1 41% 98.1 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 30% Great: 49%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	43	17	60	15.5"	1280 720	CMO15A3

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 300E4C/300E5C/300E7C Builds (Compare 1,058 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Samsung 300E4C/300E5C/300E7C

CPU
Core i5-3210MIntel $52Bench 48%, 79,744 samples	349x
Core i3-3110MIntel $70Bench 48%, 34,445 samples	152x
Core i3-2328MIntelBench 47%, 7,778 samples	93x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	504x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	247x
HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 45,735 samples	200x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	46x
BX500 240GBCrucial $27Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	25x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	21x

RAM
AM1U16BC4P2-B19C 1x4GBAdataBench 30%, 1,080 samples	71x
AD73I1C1674EV 1x4GBAdataBench 25%, 5,119 samples	24x
M471B5273EB0-CK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 28%, 3,287 samples	23x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $80

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16