Asrock H670 PG Riptide

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 440%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 463%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 120%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics384% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive68.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
13 months ago, 7 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock H670 PG Riptide  (all builds)
Memory56.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230209
Uptime3.6 Days
Run DateOct 15 '23 at 21:52
Run Duration244 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-13600K-$260
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Memory 80.4
1-Core 210
2-Core 426
123% 239 Pts
4-Core 855
8-Core 1,431
139% 1,143 Pts
64-Core 2,120
131% 2,120 Pts
Poor: 117%
This bench: 120%
Great: 128%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,756
Gainward(10B0 F297) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3150 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 537.42
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
384% Outstanding
Lighting 612
Reflection 580
Parallax 722
499% 638 fps
MRender 531
Gravity 571
Splatting 308
368% 470 fps
Poor: 303%
This bench: 384%
Great: 407%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNV2S2000G 2TB
808GB free
Firmware: SBM02103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1831 2058 2399 1820 1266 1245 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
277% Outstanding
Read 1,467
Write 1,178
Mixed 1,201
SusWrite 1,770
316% 1,404 MB/s
4K Read 33.7
4K Write 177
4K Mixed 33.4
187% 81.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,152
DQ Write 1,372
DQ Mixed 739
702% 1,088 MB/s
Poor: 163%
This bench: 277%
Great: 394%
WDC WD20EZAZ-00GGJB0 2TB
578GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 108 112 108 111 109 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
16.6% Very poor
Read 174
Write 148
Mixed 93.2
SusWrite 109
29% 131 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 8.4
4K Mixed 0.8
10% 4.07 MB/s
DQ Read 0.9
DQ Write 9.4
DQ Mixed 1.3
2% 3.87 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 16.6%
Great: 23%
WDC WDS500G2B0B-00YS70 500GB
111GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 411040WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 189 160 129 139 117 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
68.1% Good
Read 392
Write 214
Mixed 193
SusWrite 153
53% 238 MB/s
4K Read 21.6
4K Write 51
4K Mixed 28.5
96% 33.7 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 216
DQ Mixed 211
180% 268 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 114%
Kingston SNV2S2000G 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: SBM02103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1270 1679 1675 1678 1648 1612 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
256% Outstanding
Read 1,393
Write 1,232
Mixed 1122
SusWrite 1,594
301% 1,335 MB/s
4K Read 32.9
4K Write 143
4K Mixed 33.4
168% 69.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,155
DQ Write 1,250
DQ Mixed 702
667% 1,036 MB/s
Poor: 163%
This bench: 256%
Great: 394%
Seagate ST4000VX016-3CV104 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: CV10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 172 187 185 186 190 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 67% Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX CMK64GX4M2E3200C16 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
108% Outstanding
MC Read 40.8
MC Write 38.7
MC Mixed 37
111% 38.8 GB/s
SC Read 26.8
SC Write 43
SC Mixed 32.6
98% 34.1 GB/s
Latency 80
50% 80 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 108%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 144 31.5" 1920 1017 AOC3201 32G1WG4
Typical H670 PG Riptide Builds (Compare 270 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asrock H670 PG Riptide

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 117% - Outstanding Total price: $542
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback