Asus P11C-X Series

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics7.28% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive44.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus P11C-X Series  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK P11C-X Series
Memory59.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220729
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 15 '23 at 21:05
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900KF-$269
CPU1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
93.5% Outstanding
Memory 89.6
1-Core 147
2-Core 281
95% 173 Pts
4-Core 523
8-Core 928
87% 726 Pts
64-Core 1,285
80% 1,285 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 93.5%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2000D
Nvidia(10DE 096F) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 474.44
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
7.28% Terrible
Lighting 8.1
Reflection 10.4
Parallax 10.6
7% 9.7 fps
MRender 11.9
Gravity 10.6
Splatting 9.5
9% 10.7 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.28%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 1000GB
575GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 04RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 104 103 101 144 152 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
44.9% Average
Read 375
Write 345
Mixed 268
SusWrite 134
63% 281 MB/s
4K Read 17.7
4K Write 33.4
4K Mixed 11.5
59% 20.9 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 74.5
DQ Mixed 6.3
29% 65.5 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 58%
Asmt USB3.0 1TB
733GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 142 141 141 142 142 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
80.1% Excellent
Read 138
Write 133
Mixed 102
SusWrite 142
95% 128 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
200% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 95%
Verbatim STORE N GO 16GB
11GB free, PID 0302
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 9.3 10 9.5 9.5 9.8 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
6.09% Terrible
Read 22.4
Write 0.7
Mixed 2.7
SusWrite 8.8
9% 8.65 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
14% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 6.09%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS16G4D240FSB.16FBD 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
MC Read 27.7
MC Write 31
MC Mixed 25.9
81% 28.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 35.1
SC Mixed 25.8
75% 26.2 GB/s
Latency 68.6
58% 68.6 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 60 21.7" 1280 720 GSM5AB7 LG IPS FULLHD
Typical P11C-X Series Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

System: Asus P11C-X Series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $94
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback