MSI MS-15H4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics12.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive326% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
7 months ago, 6 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star Modern 15 H B13M
MotherboardMSI MS-15H4  (all builds)
Memory25.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230706
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 15 '23 at 19:12
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13900H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
93.1% Outstanding
Memory 70.3
1-Core 204
2-Core 330
107% 202 Pts
4-Core 621
8-Core 900
95% 760 Pts
64-Core 1,275
79% 1,275 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 93.1%
Great: 115%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
MSI(1462 13FA) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4314
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
12.4% Very poor
Lighting 21.9
Reflection 29
Parallax 26.5
18% 25.8 fps
MRender 0.1
Gravity 6.5
Splatting 0.6
2% 2.4 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 23%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVL41T0HBLB-00BTW 1TB
872GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HXC70W1Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1761 1784 2137 2157 1143 1163 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
326% Outstanding
Read 1,990
Write 1,992
Mixed 1,909
SusWrite 1691
427% 1,896 MB/s
4K Read 71.9
4K Write 184
4K Mixed 84.6
315% 113 MB/s
DQ Read 1,297
DQ Write 788
DQ Mixed 917
717% 1,001 MB/s
Poor: 215%
This bench: 326%
Great: 380%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43EB1-CWE 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 39.3
MC Write 38.2
MC Mixed 35.6
108% 37.7 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 39
SC Mixed 27
81% 28.3 GB/s
Latency 99
40% 99 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 101%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 56 26 60 15.5" 1536 864 AUO2E8D
Typical MS-15H4 Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat

Motherboard: MSI MS-15H4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback