Asrock H510M-HDV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics92.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive46.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsrock H510M-HDV  (all builds)
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
DisplayΧρώματα 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210128
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateOct 15 '23 at 18:01
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400F-$98
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
89.5% Excellent
Memory 90.1
1-Core 119
2-Core 243
85% 151 Pts
4-Core 478
8-Core 744
75% 611 Pts
64-Core 932
58% 932 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$273
Nvidia(10DE 134D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 537.58
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
92.4% Outstanding
Lighting 116
Reflection 177
Parallax 114
94% 136 fps
MRender 139
Gravity 97.9
Splatting 95.2
89% 111 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intenso SATAIII 240GB
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T1125A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 75 38 76 39 76 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
46.4% Average
Read 409
Write 241
Mixed 27.4
SusWrite 62.9
40% 185 MB/s
4K Read 18
4K Write 38.8
4K Mixed 16.8
69% 24.5 MB/s
DQ Read 153
DQ Write 81.2
DQ Mixed 0.4
32% 78.2 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 94%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
695GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 168 171 170 172 168 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
95.4% Outstanding
Read 163
Write 175
Mixed 80
SusWrite 169
107% 147 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
145% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 95.4%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-2G6B1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
81.3% Excellent
MC Read 31.4
MC Write 31.6
MC Mixed 23.1
82% 28.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 34.2
SC Mixed 24.1
72% 25.1 GB/s
Latency 65
62% 65 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 43 7 144 23.8" 1280 720 VSC0D39 XG2405
Typical H510M-HDV Builds (Compare 553 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock H510M-HDV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $291
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback