Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F17 FX706HF_FX706HF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics57.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive190% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
8 months ago, 8 months ago.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming F17 FX706HF_FX706HF  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX706HF
Memory22.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230720
Uptime1 Days
Run DateOct 15 '23 at 17:03
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
82% Excellent
Memory 68.9
1-Core 148
2-Core 294
90% 170 Pts
4-Core 510
8-Core 827
82% 669 Pts
64-Core 971
60% 971 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 82%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2050
Asus(1043 3098) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3734
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Lighting 81.5
Reflection 55.9
Parallax 65.1
66% 67.5 fps
MRender 42
Gravity 54.7
Splatting 53
41% 49.9 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 58%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVLQ512HBLU-00B00 512GB
355GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXM7501Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1645 394 186 172 153 124 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
190% Outstanding
Read 1,591
Write 1682
Mixed 1,493
SusWrite 446
292% 1,303 MB/s
4K Read 43.4
4K Write 98.9
4K Mixed 57.4
192% 66.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,130
DQ Write 663
DQ Mixed 798
621% 864 MB/s
Poor: 111%
This bench: 190%
Great: 253%
Nvme CT1000P5 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: P7CR403 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2886 3722 3211 1375 1267 1238 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
413% Outstanding
Read 3,584
Write 3,369
Mixed 2,622
SusWrite 2,283
666% 2,965 MB/s
4K Read 62.8
4K Write 136
4K Mixed 85.7
277% 94.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,226
DQ Write 724
DQ Mixed 891
686% 947 MB/s
Poor: 179%
This bench: 413%
Great: 500%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance SODIM DDR4 3200 C22 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
90.5% Outstanding
MC Read 35.9
MC Write 35.2
MC Mixed 30.1
96% 33.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 38
SC Mixed 18.2
70% 24.3 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 144 17.3" 1280 720 AUODDA7 B173HAN04.9
Typical ASUS TUF Gaming F17 FX706HF_FX706HF Builds (Compare 161 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F17 FX706HF_FX706HF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback