Asus H110M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics61.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive37.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
8 months ago, 8 months ago.
MotherboardAsus H110M-K  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170704
Uptime2.5 Days
Run DateOct 15 '23 at 13:52
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 29%
Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600K-$59
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Memory 79.2
1-Core 105
2-Core 206
74% 130 Pts
4-Core 375
8-Core 388
51% 382 Pts
64-Core 369
23% 369 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 537.13
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
61.2% Good
Lighting 80.2
Reflection 77.2
Parallax 75.8
65% 77.7 fps
MRender 63.8
Gravity 73.8
Splatting 59.2
53% 65.6 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 04RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 85 30 27 32 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
37.2% Below average
Read 385
Write 315
Mixed 121
SusWrite 58
49% 220 MB/s
4K Read 16.8
4K Write 26.8
4K Mixed 6.6
48% 16.7 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 89.7
DQ Mixed 19.2
37% 74.4 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 56%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
158GB free
Firmware: 3B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 77 74 76 79 79 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
47.2% Average
Read 87
Write 83.4
Mixed 60.4
SusWrite 77.2
57% 77 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 62%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
635GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 190 184 191 193 193 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 168
Write 166
Mixed 91
SusWrite 186
112% 153 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 101%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905678-156.A00G 9905702-137.A00G 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
66.8% Good
MC Read 24.3
MC Write 26
MC Mixed 20.7
68% 23.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 24.8
SC Mixed 20.3
57% 19.9 GB/s
Latency 75.6
53% 75.6 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 30 8 0 23.8" 1280 720 HWP3320 HP 24es
Typical H110M-K Builds (Compare 6,022 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H110M-K

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $157
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback