Today's hottest deals

Asrock A520M-HDV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics87.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive49.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock A520M-HDV  (all builds)
Memory24.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 15 '23 at 13:49
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User CRI-User
Background CPU 54%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 4600G
AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
52.6% Above average
Memory 53
1-Core 118
2-Core 198
67% 123 Pts
4-Core 300
8-Core 306
40% 303 Pts
64-Core 224
14% 224 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
EVGA(3842 6674) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 537.42
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
87.2% Excellent
Lighting 111
Reflection 110
Parallax 102
90% 108 fps
MRender 95.6
Gravity 102
Splatting 98.2
81% 98.5 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650 120GB-$14
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0212B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 28 31 28 25 28 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
49.2% Average
Read 410
Write 352
Mixed 23.4
SusWrite 52.3
46% 209 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 70.4
4K Mixed 1.4
78% 32.6 MB/s
DQ Read 111
DQ Write 277
DQ Mixed 1.4
56% 130 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 88%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$23
135GB free
Firmware: MS1OA7C0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 100 102 100 101 100 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
61.9% Good
Read 115
Write 124
Mixed 24.6
SusWrite 100
66% 91.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
142% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 103%
Hitachi HTS725050A7E630 500GB-$125
221GB free
Firmware: GH2ZB550
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 72 73 73 71 73 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
36.4% Below average
Read 54.2
Write 80.7
Mixed 25.3
SusWrite 72.7
42% 58.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.3
72% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
66% Good
MC Read 22.8
MC Write 26
MC Mixed 24.5
70% 24.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 18.5
SC Mixed 15
46% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 87.6
46% 87.6 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 66%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 0 36.1" 1280 720 XMD0076 Mi TV
Typical A520M-HDV Builds (Compare 798 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock A520M-HDV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $140
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback