HP 810-350se

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive60.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 months ago, 7 months ago.
SystemHP 810-350se  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 2ACE
Memory14.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140430
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 14 '23 at 20:13
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU 55%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4960X-$1,189
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
59% Above average
Memory 70.6
1-Core 95.9
2-Core 145
62% 104 Pts
4-Core 256
8-Core 424
42% 340 Pts
64-Core 673
42% 673 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 59%
Great: 88%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 128GB
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: W0222A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 153 145 144 153 144 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
60.3% Good
Read 369
Write 318
Mixed 308
SusWrite 148
64% 286 MB/s
4K Read 20.3
4K Write 63.3
4K Mixed 20
90% 34.5 MB/s
DQ Read 124
DQ Write 302
DQ Mixed 50
85% 158 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965525-024.A00LF 9965525-055.A00LF 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
46.7% Average
MC Read 19.4
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 16.9
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 9.2
SC Mixed 8.8
26% 9.27 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 41 34 64 0" 1024 705
Typical 810-350se Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

System: HP 810-350se

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Good Total price: $238
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback