HP EliteBook 2570p

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics3.17% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
8 months ago, 8 months ago.
SystemHP EliteBook 2570p  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 17DF
Memory1.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131008
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 14 '23 at 19:42
Run Duration213 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3340M
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 33.3
2-Core 15.3
14% 24.3 Pts
4-Core 42.5
8-Core 86.1
8% 64.3 Pts
64-Core 53.1
3% 53.1 Pts
Poor: 32% Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
HP(103C 17DF) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
3.17% Terrible
Lighting 4.5
Reflection 1.4
Parallax 2.9
4% 2.93 fps
MRender 2.2
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 3.4
2% 2.6 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.17%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteonit LCS-128M6S-HP 128GB
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DC71704
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 250
Write 9.2
Mixed 18.2
19% 92.6 MB/s
4K Read 38.7
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1.8
61% 13.7 MB/s
Poor: 57% Great: 99%
Generic SA02G SD Card 2GB
2GB free
Firmware: 0.7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 8.9
Write 2.2
Mixed 3.2
4% 4.77 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
33% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
7.9% Terrible
MC Read 3.6
MC Write 2.1
MC Mixed 3.2
8% 2.97 GB/s
SC Read 1.5
SC Write 1.8
SC Mixed 0.7
4% 1.33 GB/s
Latency 511
8% 511 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 7.9%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 23 16 40 13.4" 1366 768 SEC4149
Typical EliteBook 2570p Builds (Compare 459 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 2570p

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback