Medion MD35352

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 136%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 129%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics135% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive263% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
8 months ago, 8 months ago.
SystemMedion MD35352  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION B660H7-M20
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220610
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 14 '23 at 14:17
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12400-$146
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
99.1% Outstanding
Memory 86.6
1-Core 179
2-Core 352
109% 206 Pts
4-Core 599
8-Core 1019
98% 809 Pts
64-Core 1,179
73% 1,179 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 99.1%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
Zotac(19DA 9630) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 537.58
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
135% Outstanding
Lighting 192
Reflection 182
Parallax 188
156% 187 fps
MRender 193
Gravity 141
Splatting 121
121% 152 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 135%
Great: 136%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
E15-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R 1TB
911GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EHFM31.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1767 1964 2364 2457 2451 252 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
263% Outstanding
Read 1,213
Write 2,113
Mixed 1,102
SusWrite 1,876
358% 1,576 MB/s
4K Read 32.3
4K Write 84.8
4K Mixed 44.2
150% 53.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,412
DQ Write 1,022
DQ Mixed 1,184
894% 1,206 MB/s
Poor: 133%
This bench: 263%
Great: 333%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43EB2-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
110% Outstanding
MC Read 42.7
MC Write 40.8
MC Mixed 37.2
115% 40.2 GB/s
SC Read 23.7
SC Write 42.7
SC Mixed 29
91% 31.8 GB/s
Latency 72.1
56% 72.1 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 110%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 22 1 60 34" 1280 720 MSI3DB6 MSI MAG342CQR
Typical MD35352 Builds (Compare 58 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 128%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 120%
UFO

System: Medion MD35352

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $486
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback