Lattepanda Sigma

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics17.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLattepanda Sigma  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory8.8 GB free of 16 GB
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230407
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateOct 14 '23 at 04:05
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1340P
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
88.7% Excellent
Memory 61.6
1-Core 185
2-Core 354
103% 200 Pts
4-Core 626
8-Core 861
94% 744 Pts
64-Core 1,224
76% 1,224 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4575
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
17.3% Very poor
Lighting 20.7
Reflection 25.2
Parallax 24.6
17% 23.5 fps
MRender 21.4
Gravity 28.8
Splatting 18
18% 22.7 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 23%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB
98GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 731030WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,240
Write 2,343
Mixed 2,045
494% 2,209 MB/s
4K Read 65.7
4K Write 194
4K Mixed 74.1
297% 111 MB/s
DQ Read 1,772
DQ Write 1,481
DQ Mixed 1,437
1,128% 1,563 MB/s
Poor: 195% Great: 507%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$155
2TB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3265 3278 3282 2953 3315 3330 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
470% Outstanding
Read 2,323
Write 2,741
Mixed 2,440
SusWrite 3,237
609% 2,685 MB/s
4K Read 67.1
4K Write 205
4K Mixed 100
339% 124 MB/s
DQ Read 1889
DQ Write 1,445
DQ Mixed 1,631
1,230% 1,655 MB/s
Poor: 283%
This bench: 470%
Great: 526%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h clocked @ 6400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
160% Outstanding
MC Read 61.1
MC Write 69
MC Mixed 60.4
181% 63.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 48.1
SC Mixed 25.3
86% 30.1 GB/s
Latency 126
32% 126 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 160%
Great: 154%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 26" 1280 720 ROW0000
Typical Sigma Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

System: Lattepanda Sigma

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback