Dell Precision Tower 3620

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics29.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell Precision Tower 3620
MotherboardDell Precision Tower 3620  (all builds)
Memory24.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230818
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 14 '23 at 02:21
Run Duration243 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 40%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
54.2% Above average
Memory 72.6
1-Core 91.4
2-Core 105
57% 89.5 Pts
4-Core 194
8-Core 313
31% 254 Pts
64-Core 488
30% 488 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.8% Poor
Lighting 37.6
Reflection 40.7
Parallax 38.6
31% 39 fps
MRender 37.3
Gravity 40.6
Splatting 27.8
28% 35.2 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
94GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1913
Write 1,709
Mixed 1,422
374% 1,681 MB/s
4K Read 43.8
4K Write 72
4K Mixed 52.4
172% 56.1 MB/s
DQ Read 670
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 508
380% 514 MB/s
Poor: 178% Great: 355%
WDC WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TB
114GB free
Firmware: 411030WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 328 392 391 426 428 428 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
94.1% Outstanding
Read 425
Write 400
Mixed 360
SusWrite 399
89% 396 MB/s
4K Read 28.3
4K Write 59.9
4K Mixed 36.8
122% 41.7 MB/s
DQ Read 368
DQ Write 294
DQ Mixed 251
210% 305 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 94.1%
Great: 117%
Samsung PM871a 2.5 7mm 512GB
37GB free
Firmware: MAV02D0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 406 430 398 422 425 421 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 432
Write 417
Mixed 353
SusWrite 417
91% 405 MB/s
4K Read 32.5
4K Write 61.6
4K Mixed 42.9
137% 45.7 MB/s
DQ Read 368
DQ Write 300
DQ Mixed 331
249% 333 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 101%
Great: 126%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
197GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 114 112 115 115 115 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
70.9% Very good
Read 133
Write 122
Mixed 105
SusWrite 113
88% 119 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.9
192% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 109%
ST3500418AS 500GB
229GB free, PID 1066
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 78 78 78 78 78 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
38% Below average
Read 110
Write 116
Mixed 69.2
SusWrite 78.1
124% 93.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
91% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 38%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
63.9% Good
MC Read 23.1
MC Write 26.4
MC Mixed 21.7
68% 23.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 24.9
SC Mixed 19.5
53% 18.5 GB/s
Latency 192
21% 192 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 23.5" 1280 720 SPT099D E24
Typical Precision Tower 3620 Builds (Compare 3,275 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell Precision Tower 3620

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $217
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback