MSI MAG Z790 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7D91)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 181%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 124%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 213%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 127%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics143% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive522% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D91
MotherboardMSI MAG Z790 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7D91)  (all builds)
Memory23.9 GB free of 32 GB
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230516
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateOct 14 '23 at 02:13
Run Duration217 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700K-$320
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 5.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
127% Outstanding
Memory 87.4
1-Core 223
2-Core 448
130% 253 Pts
4-Core 893
8-Core 1,689
154% 1,291 Pts
64-Core 3,088
191% 3,088 Pts
Poor: 120%
This bench: 127%
Great: 131%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 537.58
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
143% Outstanding
Lighting 200
Reflection 192
Parallax 197
163% 196 fps
MRender 207
Gravity 168
Splatting 139
136% 171 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 143%
Great: 139%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN850X NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$89
744GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 620331WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4842 4073 1186 1155 1079 1147 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
522% Outstanding
Read 4,554
Write 4,946
Mixed 3,421
SusWrite 2,247
851% 3,792 MB/s
4K Read 83.4
4K Write 238
4K Mixed 108
391% 143 MB/s
DQ Read 2,002
DQ Write 1,718
DQ Mixed 1,871
1,399% 1,863 MB/s
Poor: 251%
This bench: 522%
Great: 598%
Crucial MX500 4TB-$296
3.5TB free
Firmware: M3CR046
SusWrite @10s intervals: 387 387 386 387 388 387 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
90% Outstanding
Read 301
Write 388
Mixed 320
SusWrite 387
79% 349 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 74.8
4K Mixed 44.8
143% 49.9 MB/s
DQ Read 229
DQ Write 198
DQ Mixed 136
123% 188 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 90%
Great: 119%
Asmt 2135 3TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 41 41 42 41 41 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
26.7% Poor
Read 51
Write 37
Mixed 34.1
SusWrite 41.3
30% 40.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
202% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 26.7%
Great: 103%
BUFFALO HD-LE-A 4TB
2TB free, PID 02e8
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 126 125 123 126 124 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
53.7% Above average
Read 144
Write 136
Mixed 55.4
SusWrite 124
151% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
91% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH32GX5M2X7000C34 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 7000 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
209% Outstanding
MC Read 90.5
MC Write 81.1
MC Mixed 78.4
238% 83.3 GB/s
SC Read 23.5
SC Write 51.4
SC Mixed 33.2
103% 36 GB/s
Latency 68.2
59% 68.2 ns
Poor: 142%
This bench: 209%
Great: 242%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 144 27" 1280 720 MSI3FA7 MSI MAG271CQR
Typical MAG Z790 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7D91) Builds (Compare 5,508 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 442%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 123%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 528%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG Z790 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7D91)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $2,250
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback