Alienware m16 R1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 227%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 113%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 272%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 108%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics215% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive500% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
10 months ago, 10 months ago.
SystemAlienware m16 R1  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 0VJGY5
Memory47.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230814
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 13 '23 at 14:15
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13900HX
U3E1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Memory 76.7
1-Core 212
2-Core 405
119% 231 Pts
4-Core 744
8-Core 1,275
122% 1,010 Pts
64-Core 2,933
182% 2,933 Pts
Poor: 108%
This bench: 108%
Great: 120%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090 (Laptop)
Dell(1028 0BFC) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3742
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
215% Outstanding
Lighting 312
Reflection 328
Parallax 312
254% 317 fps
MRender 397
Gravity 256
Splatting 204
224% 286 fps
Poor: 144%
This bench: 215%
Great: 243%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme KXG80ZN84T09 KIOXIA 4096GB
3TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11304102 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3500 3819 3801 3908 3912 3857 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
500% Outstanding
Read 3,069
Write 3,799
Mixed 2722
SusWrite 3,800
758% 3,348 MB/s
4K Read 53.4
4K Write 166
4K Mixed 92
287% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 1,387
DQ Write 1,093
DQ Mixed 1,245
930% 1,242 MB/s
Poor: 232%
This bench: 500%
Great: 546%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMCG88AEBSA095N 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
149% Outstanding
MC Read 60.6
MC Write 57
MC Mixed 57
166% 58.2 GB/s
SC Read 19
SC Write 44.4
SC Mixed 29.5
88% 31 GB/s
Latency 93.7
43% 93.7 ns
Poor: 124%
This bench: 149%
Great: 161%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 54 25 120 16" 1280 720 CMN161C
Typical m16 R1 Builds (Compare 743 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 153%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 184%
UFO

System: Alienware m16 R1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $98Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $205Nvidia RTX 4070 $519Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback