Skikk Loki 16 III

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 280%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 120%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 310%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 119%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics243% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive484% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemSkikk Loki 16 III  (all builds)
MotherboardSKIKK.EU Loki III RTX 4090
Memory58.1 GB free of 64 GB
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit kleuren,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230725
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 13 '23 at 12:30
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13900HX
U3E1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
119% Outstanding
Memory 86.5
1-Core 218
2-Core 424
126% 243 Pts
4-Core 813
8-Core 1,339
131% 1,076 Pts
64-Core 2,592
160% 2,592 Pts
Poor: 108%
This bench: 119%
Great: 120%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090 (Laptop)
Device(1D05 1251) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3667
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
243% Outstanding
Lighting 356
Reflection 360
Parallax 417
290% 378 fps
MRender 459
Gravity 304
Splatting 220
256% 328 fps
Poor: 142%
This bench: 243%
Great: 244%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$170
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B2QJXD7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4220 4199 4257 4406 4408 2202 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
484% Outstanding
Read 2,517
Write 3,868
Mixed 2930
SusWrite 3,949
754% 3,316 MB/s
4K Read 57.8
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 82.2
252% 84.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,632
DQ Write 1199
DQ Mixed 1,401
1,051% 1,411 MB/s
Poor: 299%
This bench: 484%
Great: 592%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF556S40-32 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
184% Outstanding
MC Read 75.9
MC Write 71.3
MC Mixed 70.7
208% 72.6 GB/s
SC Read 20.1
SC Write 51.3
SC Mixed 32.5
99% 34.6 GB/s
Latency 73.2
55% 73.2 ns
Poor: 108%
This bench: 184%
Great: 182%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 240 16" 1280 720 BOE0A3B
Typical Loki 16 III Builds (Compare 131 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 212%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 256%
UFO

System: Skikk Loki 16 III

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback