Dell Precision 3480

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics40.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive264% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemDell Precision 3480  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0C73H1
Memory25.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230912
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 13 '23 at 12:21
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1360P
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
93.9% Outstanding
Memory 73.7
1-Core 198
2-Core 359
110% 210 Pts
4-Core 612
8-Core 932
96% 772 Pts
64-Core 1,326
82% 1,326 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 93.9%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX A500 Laptop GPU
Dell(1028 0C02) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3742
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
40.4% Average
Lighting 53.4
Reflection 55.3
Parallax 50
44% 52.9 fps
MRender 34.4
Gravity 43.8
Splatting 45.5
34% 41.2 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 43%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PC SN740 NVMe WD 512GB
208GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 73914107 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1909 2289 2183 726 353 282 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
264% Outstanding
Read 2,178
Write 1,734
Mixed 1431
SusWrite 1,290
371% 1,658 MB/s
4K Read 48
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 58.2
206% 72.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,055
DQ Write 510
DQ Mixed 835
606% 800 MB/s
Poor: 100%
This bench: 264%
Great: 464%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G48C40S5.C8A1 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
151% Outstanding
MC Read 62.4
MC Write 58.1
MC Mixed 55.7
168% 58.7 GB/s
SC Read 20.6
SC Write 49.6
SC Mixed 29.1
95% 33.1 GB/s
Latency 90.4
44% 90.4 ns
Poor: 107%
This bench: 151%
Great: 153%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 34" 1280 720 XMI3444 Mi Monitor
Typical Precision 3480 Builds (Compare 51 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: Dell Precision 3480

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback